When examining various Biblical and Arthurian legends, one notices numerous interesting parallels, that, given the chronology of their appearance, suggest that the Arthurian legends derived from the Biblical ones. In support of this thesis, one should note that the clergy, who were the authors of the early Arthurian stories, were familiar with the Bible and had an established pattern of having borrowed plots and replacing the main characters.
In a number of Arthurian legends, incidents that are described in the Jewish sources are repeated, with minor or major modifications. According to Moses Gaster, the clergy in the early Middle Ages had almost exclusive possession of written knowledge. Few people besides them knew how to write.One prominent example of such recasting of a Jewish legend in the garb of a story palatable to contemporary audiences is the story of King Vortigern and Merlin, in Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain. (Gaster 969) This story comes from a much earlier tale about King Solomon and Ashmedai, which is transformed by recasting the setting, characters, and actions to a more modern and acceptable form. Here are summaries of the King Solomon and Ashmedai story, as well as the King Vortigern and Merlin story.
[Full text of Ashmedai and Solomon Story] [Works Cited] [Next]