asked us to prepare tosefta

his q is: is the tosefta diff than the mishna, in principle? we saw has diff examples. has another source for the principle of akirat haguf vs kiyum vs bitul miktzas.
mishna, brayta, brayta in torat kohanim are the same
vs the tosefta.

source:
mishna: veneelam DAVAR. davazr velo kol haguf.
tosefta: gezera shava: davar davar.

tosefta's cases: dam: eating. chelev. pigul. peterin.
livatel ulkayem: chayavin.
only chayav on dam hakarev lesLamim.
only chayav on chelev hakarev lesLamim.
only chayav pigul shel shlamim.

mishna had what you were patur for, tosefta had what you are chayav for. michlal lav ata shomea hen.

tzukermandel adds using < symbol, the word אלא, bases on bet daled. that it vienna, and dfus rishon.

is it different?
dam hanefesh is while dying. tamtzit = essence. the end of it. evarim: why you need to salt.
mitzpeh shmuel and minchat bikurim.
mitzpeh shmuel: dam nefesh. but tamtzit mutar.

if nefesh. what about dam chatat, what about dam chulin.
even for chullin.

minchat bikurim: 1st peshat:  dam hakarev lishlamim. nefesh vs tamtzit. even though there is no karet, (mishna says only chayav on things which have karet), here the inyan in general is one that has a chiyuv karet.
see bavli 8a.

so in other words, a little bit forced, though he gives an answer.

does he say something specific about the choice of the word shlamim?
since the torah says pigul only by shelamim.
q: thats fine for pigul. but tamtzit vs. nefesh, no diff!

forced.

same for chelev. certain parts of the chelev is offered. permitted chalev on dakin. (the colon)

another problem. first two cases, shelamim is davka. in third instance the shelamim is davka.

2nd perush of minchat bikurim: mamash shlamim. their decision only nby chelev shelamim. but other korbanot, and that of chullin is permitted.
all dam permitted except that of shlamim. other korbanot and chullin is permitted.
why did they make this distinctiopn? they madfe a mistake, since the pasuk, chukat olam... kol dam vechol chelev lo tochelu was written by shelamim.


Vayikra 3:17:

if indeed this is the case, then shlamim is davka.
since no pigul in shelamim. 

minchat bikurim: where written pigul? since torah says pigul by shlamim.
Vayikra 7:18, 19:7
a type of karaim.
if this is the case, 

many times dam is written, not by shlamim. 

now compare situation. is it the same cases as mishna?

dam mentioned Vayikra 17:11. speaking about dam kodshim, not shlamim. so see dam kodshim is a pasuk meforash.

chelev:
Vayikra 7:22
chelev as general issur. in all the korbanot. have biblical origin, in pasuk meforash.

pigul: only shalmim.
sifra tzav perek 13 halacha 4: even though says pigul only on shelamim, since says vayinazru mekol kodshe yisrael, includes other korbanot as well.

so its origin is in דרשה.

דם בקדשים מפורש
חלב בקדשים מפורש
פיגול בקדשים בדרשה

if so, no diff bet mishna and tosefta.

J: q: but what about acc to mitzpeh shmuel? going to work out also as first two from drash, but last from drasha also!!! so then do not have any idea of something that said explicit!

Shick: now, no diff bet the cases in tosefta. to what end??


Rabeinu Baruch: psuedo-Rabenu Chananel. one small change. the lamed in first two examples. become shamayim rather than shlamim (thus the large L's I wrote above).

bottom of 5a.
rabeinu baruch has only this by the second case, bu chelev.
porof leiberman brings girsa of sefeer hamitzvot of rav chefetz. for dam has shamayim.

now what is the difference?
it becomes all korbanot for the first two, and only shlamim for the last.
is memaet chullin.

even if have for chullin, do we have an issur karet on it?
to make it short, check kritut 21a, 
דתניא: דם - מה תלמוד לומר כל דם? לפי שנאמר "כי הדם היא בנפש יכפר" )בקדשים) דם חולין ודם התמצית מנין? תלמוד לומר כל דם

this is not meforash. it is a derasha!

so, the only examples given are that we accept things written meforash, but things learned via derasha NOT.

chelev we had another brayta: found in pesachim 43b: also have in sifra
תניא: "כי כל אוכל חלב מן הבהמה אשר יקריב (פרק ז) אין לי אלא חלב תמימים...בעלי מומין...חלב חולין מנין
we have a derasha.

if this is the case, all these cases, they were matir only that which karet was based in derasha. in ALL the 3 cases.

if so, big diff bet brayta and mishna.

in mishna, even bowing, which is an explicit pasuk.
acc to the brayta, impossible.

tosefta would consider something like bowing akirat hakol.

if so, we have the key for the entire sugya.

what were the difficulties.
shmuel and rav yosef
also, saw 1st two kushyot on shmuel don't make sense.

prepare 4a from tno rabanan until 4b up to the mishna.